Home : Forum : Links : Tech Data : Help the Site! : VIP Login
UK Auctions : USA Auctions : Retail Therapy
Yamaha RD/RZ Motorcycle Forum Index » General RD/RZ Chat

Cooling vs aerodynamism

Jump to:  
Post new topic Reply to topic
View Thread
Author Message
Post subject: Cooling vs aerodynamism Reply with quote
KX3Offline
Mmm, Fully Synthetic!
Mmm, Fully Synthetic!
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Total posts: 1383
Location: Québec
My F2 is converted to N2. Drag resistance is already important on a naked bike. I'm wondering what would be the best choice: should I fit the plastic air guide to force the air into the rad or should I leave it to get a better C factor? Any signifiant change?
I guess that high speed driving wouldn't need air guide for cooling but I want to have the best of both world: cooling efficiency and high top speed.


Post Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 6:02 am
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
BillyOffline
One-handed Stoppie!
One-handed Stoppie!
Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Total posts: 2490
Location: Sweden arise!
Road bike or a race bike? If you'll have it on the road then go for better cooling. A bit safer, it wouldn't be very nice having an engine lockup at high velocity would it!
If it is a race bike then go for aerodynamics, if you crash because of a siezed engine then you will most likely not get hurt would you? There's no steel fences or trees to smash into on a track is it?

Aint it possible to build new plastic of fibre glass? You might be able to squeze in a air guide then? Question


Post Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 8:58 am
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
fzrmanOffline
Powerband Master
Powerband Master
Joined: 14 Feb 2004
Total posts: 591
Location: Hants
does it make that much difference? Id have thought the jacket youre wearing spoils the aerodynamics more than a small air dam?


Post Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:08 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
Drewski
RD/RZ Jedi Master
RD/RZ Jedi Master
Location: The Bunker,Cambridge, UK
fzrman wrote:
does it make that much difference? Id have thought the jacket youre wearing spoils the aerodynamics more than a small air dam?


That's what I was going to say, you're the biggest drag factor, (I mean that in the nicest possible sense), and the fairing is/was there for you to get behind Wink


Post Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 4:27 pm
View user's profile Send e-mail 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
TygerTungOffline
Daily Burner
Daily Burner
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Total posts: 198
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
You're gonna be going pretty good to get your bike hot riding it on the street.

It's pretty much impossible to ride with as much wide open throttle on the street as the track, and as a result your bike gets much hotter on the track.


Post Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:33 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
jonwall05Offline
Regular Racer
Regular Racer
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Total posts: 454
and for what u gonna gain from it i wouldnt bother if flat out straight line speed u after gear it up drop 1 or 2 teeth on the back sprocket or go up 1 on the front if it will pull it


Post Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 10:55 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
jante350Offline
RD/RZ Jedi Master
RD/RZ Jedi Master
Joined: 05 Aug 2003
Total posts: 5373
Location: Bergen, Norway
I agree on that. My 500 misses the heat shield under the seat, and you can very much feel the heat building up under your ass just by one small 120mph trash, or just overtaking a couple of cars in one go, the engine doesnt produce much excess heat when it poodles along, but when you are on full tap its a freaking furnice down there...


Post Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 10:48 am
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
xen-unoOffline
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Total posts: 845
I'm surprised I can hit 120 mph relatively easy on mine (in a tuck position). I've removed all the aero body work which was pretty minimalistic in the first place. A decent car with the same power to weight ratio could hit 150 or so. It's impossible to make a bike truly aerodynamic and be able to ride the thing (comfortably). The newer street bikes have dropped frontal area a bit but have also increased the fugly factor, but I would would wager that the total CoD is only slightly better than a naked bike (like mine).


Post Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:14 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
KX3Offline
Mmm, Fully Synthetic!
Mmm, Fully Synthetic!
Joined: 02 Oct 2006
Total posts: 1383
Location: Québec
Aerodynamic is VERY important on a low-powered/low-weighted bike such as F2 because inertia is quite low too.
While in 6th gear at 160 kmh, I use my body to brake and found it very effective!


Post Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:59 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
jante350Offline
RD/RZ Jedi Master
RD/RZ Jedi Master
Joined: 05 Aug 2003
Total posts: 5373
Location: Bergen, Norway
I believe the F2 will struggle real hard to 120mph without the fairing.. they key in hitting hit speeds is torque.. and those old two-strokes gots surprisingly high nm or ft/lbs numbers compared to similar big bore bikes.. did you know the FJ1200 only got a measly 10nm more torque than the RD500?


Post Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 8:28 pm
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Back to top
Options and Permissions


Display posts from previous:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
.
Page 1 of 1 .:. Post new topic Reply to topic



Google


Powered by phpBB. copyright © 2002 phpBB Group. Template design - Vereor.