Home : Forum : Links : Tech Data : Help the Site! : VIP Login
UK Auctions : USA Auctions : Retail Therapy
Yamaha RD/RZ Motorcycle Forum Index » General RD/RZ Chat

Fitting YPVS piston in a 350 lc

Jump to:  
Post new topic Reply to topic
View Thread
Author Message
Post subject: Fitting YPVS piston in a 350 lc Reply with quote
GillybobsOffline
Suburban Commuter
Suburban Commuter
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Total posts: 63
Location: Sheffield,South Yorkshire
Rebuilding the top end on my 350 lc and im fitting YPVS pistons.
Heard something about removing the tang at the bottom of the piston.
Just want to know why people have done this?? What problem does it cause.
The bike is in standard 350 lc tune . No mods.

Cheers


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:06 am
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
NORBOOffline
RD/RZ Jedi Master
RD/RZ Jedi Master
Joined: 03 Aug 2003
Total posts: 5503
Location: Nottingham
some people do and some people dont. I do


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:11 am
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
BillyOffline
One-handed Stoppie!
One-handed Stoppie!
Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Total posts: 2216
Location: Sweden arise!
Lc's doesn't have a bridged intake, which means that the tang on the piston could - if you're really unlucky - catch and break the piston.


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:17 am
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
Rich Hi, the theory goes something like this. The YPVS cylinder has a bridge down the middle of the inlet port (like a double window) so it can run a larger port and still have support for the piston skirt. The tab on the YPVS piston is in the middle of the lower rear skirt. Therefore, in a YPVS barrel this tab runs up and down quite happily against the central bridge and is nicely supported.

The LC inlet port doesn't have a bridged inlet port - it is basically one large hole without a central bridge. So, the thrust on the piston skirt will cause the piston to rock slightly and the tab will tend to 'catch' the bottom of the inlet port. There are mixed opinions about whether or not this will cause a problem - some people say it will be fine but if it was me, for peace of mind I would file off the tab.


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:26 am
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
1982RD350LCOffline
Regular Racer
Regular Racer
Joined: 31 May 2008
Total posts: 354
Location: Vancouver, Canada
About 2 months ago I was in your same situation and could not locate pistons for my 1982 RD350 so I settled on the ones that you are looking at. I didn't hack off the tang and rode for about 1000km with no problems. But having nothing better to do one night (and being flogged by these guys here Wink ) I took off the cylinders just to peek at my workmanship. What I found was that there was enough excessive wear to the point where the beveling around the skirt of the pistons near the tang was now a sharp edge. I dremeled off the tang and recreated that bevel on the skirt where the tang once was and just for the heck of it through both pistons on a really accurate scale and balanced them up to each other (but not sure if that's criticle (half a gram off). The job was easy enough to do in a night.


ron


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:40 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
Rich
1982RD350LC wrote:
About 2 months ago I was in your same situation and could not locate pistons for my 1982 RD350 so I settled on the ones that you are looking at. I didn't hack off the tang and rode for about 1000km with no problems. But having nothing better to do one night (and being flogged by these guys here Wink ) I took off the cylinders just to peek at my workmanship. What I found was that there was enough excessive wear to the point where the beveling around the skirt of the pistons near the tang was now a sharp edge. I dremeled off the tang and recreated that bevel on the skirt where the tang once was and just for the heck of it through both pistons on a really accurate scale and balanced them up to each other (but not sure if that's criticle (half a gram off). The job was easy enough to do in a night.


ron

Hi Ron, thanks for that info. Did you take any pics of the wear on the piston while it was apart?


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 3:47 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
GillybobsOffline
Suburban Commuter
Suburban Commuter
Joined: 25 Oct 2007
Total posts: 63
Location: Sheffield,South Yorkshire
Cheers for the info guys Very Happy
Was just trying to understand why the tang needed removing.
Think for peace of mind im going to remove the tang.
I'll keep you posted how i get on

Cheers
Gillybobs


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:33 pm
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
Back to top
Post subject: Reply with quote
BillyOffline
One-handed Stoppie!
One-handed Stoppie!
Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Total posts: 2216
Location: Sweden arise!
To be honest, you don't actually have to remove the whole tang. Filing it smooth where it meets the bottom of the intake ports is probably enough. But it looks better when removing it completely. Laughing

Oh btw, when you're at it. You could smoothen out the edges at every port inside the cylinders. I always do that so the rings doesn't catch anything as easy. Don't touch the ports at the vertical edges, you want as much as possible left there if you're using the bike on the road. Only do the horisontal edges of the ports.

They are smoothened out originally, but only roughly, and it is the roughnes you want to make smooth. Especially the exhaust ports!!

I use fine hand files and sandpapers to do the rough parts, (the material is pretty hard) and then i finish it off using sandpaper. And then fine sandpaper like 800 or so.
On some parts you don't need anything else but sandpaper since they probably used a death grinder to "smoothen the ports out". Sadly, they did this on the exhausts aswell and you will see it on a cylinder that has never been bored, so you want to take away as little material as possible, only making a smooth edge.

I think - and now i'm only guessing - you'll lose a tiny bit of engine power by doing this, but imo it's better because you eliminate another risk of seizure. Cool I've seen it soooo many times, rings catching the exhaust ports, (Even on bridged exhausts!) trashing all hell up and ruin the bore. Crying or Very sad

If you can't be arsed to do every port, then just focus on the exhaust ports. That's the most important part of the cylinder. Both upper edge and the lower edge since the rings travel over the whole ports.


Post Posted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:08 pm
View user's profile 
Back to top
Options and Permissions


Display posts from previous:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum
.
Page 1 of 1 .:. Post new topic Reply to topic



Google


Powered by phpBB. copyright © 2002 phpBB Group. Template design - Vereor.